Posts Tagged ‘Life’
Let me start right off by saying that I DO NOT SUPPORT ANYONE, ESPECIALLY THE GOVERNMENT, TELLING ANY WOMAN WHAT SHE CAN OR CANNOT DO WITH HER OWN BODY. I also know for a fact that most people that support abortions tend to be white males that have a problem with their woman killing his seed. It’s a power thing with some white Christian males that they absolutely will not tolerate their woman, who they think they own, to have ANY say in what they do with their own bodies. It’s all about control over their woman, pure an simple. If he gets her pregnant she by God will have that child no matter what the circumstances. It’s his seed, that he planted, and she better not even consider the notion of aborting that child, even if it means her death if that child is born. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with the kid, it has EVERYTHING to do with Man controlling his WOMAN. I firmly believe that a woman has the right to decide for herself what is best for her and her body. I personally do not agree or support abortion, unless it involves rape or medical reasons. It is ultimately the woman’s choice what she does with her own body. She has to be the one to live with her own decision. Now if we are talking about kids getting pregnant, that’s a whole nother topic.
Barack Obama kissed some major ass this morning during his speech to the abortion lovers of America, Planned Parenthood. They are responsible for over 300, 000 abortions. Nice bunch to be hanging with there Barry.
Obama promised that bunch of baby killers that he would never let the Republicans cut taxpayer funds for their abortions. In other words he promised them that he would force you and me to pay for hundreds of thousands of abortions regardless of our own morals or religious beliefs.
The abortion jerk said: “If there’s one thing the past few years have shown is that Planned Parenthood isn’t going anywhere, it’s not going anywhere today, it’s not going anywhere tomorrow.”The crowd of baby killers cheered him on.
Obama is the first sitting president to address the nation’s largest abortion provider.
Way to go there Barry. Your circle of friends have lots in common…terrorists and abortionists. They all get there rocks off killing the innocent.
Isn’t it just too damn bad Barry’s mother never visited Planned Parenthood? -JRoycroft
The Fact-Free Gun-Control Crusade
Stricter gun-control laws don’t reduce murder rates, but who’s counting?
Amid all the heated, emotional advocacy of gun control, have you ever heard even one person present convincing hard evidence that tighter gun-control laws have in fact reduced murders?
Think about all the states and communities within states, as well as foreign countries, that either have tight gun-control laws or loose or nonexistent ones. With so many variations and so many sources of evidence available, surely there would be some compelling evidence somewhere if tighter gun-control laws actually reduced the murder rate. And if tighter gun-control laws don’t actually reduce the murder rate, then why are we being stampeded toward such laws after every shooting that gets media attention? Have the media outlets that you follow ever even mentioned that some studies have produced evidence that murder rates tend to be higher in places with tight gun-control laws?
What almost no one talks about is that guns are used to defend lives as well as to take lives. In fact, many of the horrific killings that we see in the media were brought to an end when someone else with a gun showed up and put a stop to the slaughter. The Cato Institute estimates that there are upwards of 100,000 defensive uses of guns per year. Preventing law-abiding citizens from defending themselves can cost far more lives than are lost in the shooting episodes that the media publicize. The lives saved by guns are no less precious just because the media pay no attention to them.
Many people who have never fired a gun in their lives and never faced life-threatening dangers nevertheless feel qualified to impose legal restrictions that can be fatal to others. And politicians eager to “do something” that gets them publicity know that the votes of the ignorant and the gullible are still votes.
Virtually nothing that is being proposed in current gun-control legislation is likely to reduce murder rates. Restricting the magazine capacity available to law-abiding citizens will not restrict the magazine capacity of people who are not law-abiding citizens. Such restrictions just mean that the law-abiding citizen is likely to run out of ammunition first. Someone would have to be an incredible sharpshooter to fend off three home invaders with just seven shots at moving targets. But seven is the magic number of bullets allowed in a magazine under New York State’s new gun-control laws.
People who support such laws seem to blithely assume that they are limiting the damage that can be done by criminals or the mentally ill — as if criminals or madmen care about such laws.
Banning so-called assault weapons is a farce, as well as a fraud, because there is no concrete definition of an assault weapon. That is why so many guns have to be specified by name in such bans — and the ones specified to be banned are typically no more dangerous than others that are not specified. Some people think that “assault weapons” means automatic weapons. But automatic weapons were banned decades ago. Banning ugly-looking assault weapons may have aesthetic benefits, but it does not reduce the dangers to human life in the slightest. You are just as dead when killed by a very plain-looking gun.
One of the dangerous inconsistencies of many, if not most, gun-control crusaders is that those who are most zealous to get guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens are often not nearly as concerned about keeping violent criminals behind bars. Leniency toward criminals has long been part of the pattern of gun-control zealots on both sides of the Atlantic. When the insatiable desire to crack down on law-abiding citizens with guns is combined with an attitude of leniency toward criminals, it can hardly be surprising when tighter gun-control laws are accompanied by rising rates of crime, including murders.
— Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. © 2013 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
Gun Control or Bomb Control: Same Difference: You Can’t Stop Anyone From Using a Gun or a Bomb to Kill People
April 15, 2013 – Today we had a terrible thing happen to innocent people in Boston. People out having a good old American time not bothering anyone. Families enjoying time together watching the Boston Marathon. All ages were in attendance. Then, in one split second their lives changed forever. One or more people detonated two IEDs, improvised explosive device type bombs with the pure intent to injure and kill people. They succeeded. It was a classic military style personnel attack with multiple bombings aimed at mass casualties. A diversion bomb followed by a second primary bomb.
We don’t yet know if it was Islamic, Domestic, or just some nut with a grudge that committed this act. Bomb makers have a specific recipe for their products and our law enforcement will be able to determine which group may have done this.
The terrorist probably purchased their bomb making materials from a Home Depot or even Walmart. They did not need a permit or background check to purchase anything needed to build a killer bomb. All they needed were internet instructions and basic household chemicals that most people already have in their kitchens or garages. They probably spent less money on one bomb than the cost of a single semi automatic hand gun.
At last count there were over 120 people injured in the Boston terrorist attack. Others died. It was a successful attack. It took less than one second to to inflict death and carnage to all those people.
If you add the other 3 bombs that were found that did not detonate, we might be talking about several hundred victims of this terrorist attack. All of which would have taken mere seconds to accomplish.
There is no handgun that could have done that much damage in that little time. There is no law that could have prevented this from happening. There is no law that can prevent a criminal from using a hand gun to commit mass murder. There is no law that could have prevented the Sandy Hook massacre, Columbine or any other mass killing using a firearm as a weapon. You cannot stop bad people from doing bad things. Gun control disarms innocent people and makes them vulnerable to attack. Gun control will not work.
What happens when one of these terrorists, or just some crazy person decides to target an elementary school with a bomb that was built from chemicals purchased at your local hardware store? Then what? Tell me. What will be the politically correct reaction then?
So what now? Are we to expect the Obama administration to require back ground checks for those of us purchasing everyday household cleaning supplies? Maybe we will be limited on how many bottles of ammonia we can purchase or limit what combinations of items we can purchase together at one sale.
“Sir, please show me your drivers license and sign this ATF paper which will keep track of your cleaning supply purchases.” -JRoycroft
- Deadly Terrorist Bombing Attack in Boston U.s.a. (theroycroftreport.com)
April 15, 2013 – Two bombs detonated in Boston today. Many injured, hurting and dead including an 8 year old boy.
A White House official told reporters, “Any event with multiple explosive devices – as this appears to be – is clearly an act of terror.”
Homeland Security committee member Rep. Bill Keating (D-MA) called today’s explosions a “sophisticated, coordinated event.”
The Boston Globe reported that there were up to 100 injuries stemming from the explosion and WCVB in Boston is reporting that an 8-year-old boy was among those killed in Monday’s attack.
Law-enforcement sources said at least the first explosion occurred in the lobby of a nearby hotel.
This story is still developing so I won’t speculate on anything at this point other than this was an act of terrorism by every definition. The manner in which it happened speaks of an Al Qaeda type attack.
Here’s a thought to provoke you government loving liberals- Todays deadly terrorist attack in Boston is exactly the same thing Barack Obama’s friend Bill Ayers was involved with in Washington. Yea, think about that one for a while. -JRoycroft
Two explosions near finish line...
COPS: 2 dead, 23 injured...
'Somebody's leg flew by my head'...
'Like War Zone'...
AFTERMATH FOOTAGE...**WARNING: Graphic**
NY POST: Suspect apprehended...
Saudi national under guard at hospital...
CBSNEWS: SAUDI WAS ACTING SUSPICIOUS...
Bombs were inside trash cans...
Official: Cellphone service was shut down..
FAA restricted airspace...
NYPD Deploys 1,000 Additional Officers To Guard Prominent Locations...
Secret Service Shuts Down Pennsylvania Avenue...
UK security review of London Marathon...
Sen. Feinstein: 'It could be foreign, it could be home grown'...
NYT: Possibly 5 Devices...
Families of Newtown were in grandstands during attack..
- Several Hurt In Explosions At Boston Marathon Finish Line… (wakinguphumanity.wordpress.com)
- (UPDATED) 2 Explosions at Boston Marathon, At Least 2 Dead, Dozen Injured, Saudi Suspect in Hospital (ex-skf.blogspot.com)
April 2, 2013 – The situation appears to be getting worse with North Korea…
- North Korea Threatens War: U.S. Answers With Destroyers and Stealth Bombers (theroycroftreport.com)
- A Breakdown Of Military Forces Between North Korea, South Korea, And The U.S. (warnewsupdates.blogspot.com)
- Collapse Of North Korea Worse Than Threats (vancouversun.com)
- North Korea to restart nuclear reactor (edition.cnn.com)
April 1, 2013 – This is no April fools joke. N Korea is trying to bring the United States to the brink of war and we are responding with destroyers and F-22 Raptor stealth fighter jets. Although the F-22 Raptor fighters are a part of a training mission in S Korea, they still present a strong message to Kim Jung Un of what we are capable of on sudden notice.
U.S. defense officials report that the U.S. Navy re-directed the USS McCain, a guided-missile destroyer, in the Pacific to the waters off the Korean peninsula. The destroyer is capable of intercepting and destroying any missile that North Korea fires.
On Monday, South Korean President Park Geun-hye seemed to have given her military permission to strike back in the event of an attack from North Korea without further word from Seoul. South Korean news agency Yonhap reported that the President was taking the threats “very seriously.”
“As commander-in-chief of the armed forces, I will trust the military’s judgment on abrupt and surprise provocations by North Korea,” she said, according to Yonhap.
While posing next to battle plan charts, Kim Jung Un threatened to “settle accounts” with the United States. The charts detailed targets for the bombing American cities.
The North had announced earlier this month that it was tearing up the armistice and other bilateral peace pacts signed with the South in protest against South Korea-US joint military exercises.
North Korea now has a young war monger leading its military which makes for a very unstable and unpredictable situation for not only South Korea and the U.S., but for the world as a whole.
To make matters even more complicated, China has begun moving troops to the border of North Korea. China has a long standing treaty with North Korea to protect them in the event they are attacked.
This is definitely going to be the story to watch carefully in the next few months. Lets see if Barack Obama has the guts and wear with-all to deal with this extremely dangerous situation. This isn’t a middle east type scenario, this is an in your face real war possibility we’re facing. We already have U.S. ground troops stationed in South Korea which means they will be the first to receive any aggression that crosses the border. The 2005-2012 edition of the Defense department’s annual “Base Structure Report,” which was published on Mar. 21, showed a total of 37,554 US troops stationed in South Korea as of Sept. 30, 2011.
If you’re the praying type, now would be a good time to get your two cents in for our military forces in ground zero. -JRoycroft