Posts Tagged ‘Culture’
April 1, 2013 – I cannot think of a better way to honor those among us that helped make it possible to elect the worst, most destructive, most dangerous jerk to sit in our White House in the history of our Republic than to give them this day, April 1st, as their day of remembrance.
This is for all of you moochers, leeches, deadbeats, welfare broodmares, and parasites. -JRoycroft
December 14, 2012 – Is it not enough in this hate filled society of ours that we now have a Democrat from my home state using such an insensitive word as “midget?” What the hell?
Thanks a lot there Congressman Johnson. First you embarrass us with that stupid comment about Guam tipping over. Now you go and hurt the feelings of all our little friends out there. You set one fine example for your home state sir. That was mighty small of you.
Washington Post- The Georgia Democrat used the word — offensive to some, who prefer the term “little people” to describe those with dwarfism, he noted today — in a metaphor about the Michigan labor situation in which he made a point about an unfair matchup. “What happens when you put a giant with a midget in a cage fight?” he asked rhetorically.
Ok, so I gotta know, just what do you get when you drop a midget into a cage with a giant?
Alright, enough of the insensitivity. We should all learn to appreciate the little things in life. Now show some love and go hug a midget. -JRoycroft
December 12, 2012 -Yesterday I was a little bored, and posted a bit of humor for a change about Obama. Trust me, there really is nothing funny about him. The man scares the hell out of me.
It comes to no great surprise to me that someone other than myself believes the man is dangerous, and not thinking clearly about anything he is doing. The man is on a path of trying to systematically destroy the very people who built this great country. Within the next four years we are going to see the collapse of what was once the greatest, most powerful nation on this earth. Please read what Neal has to say about this man who has dedicated his life to destroying the top producers in America – And he is doing it with the full support of a classless group of followers. We are the majority in this equation, yet the minority is winning the fight.
Neal Boortz makes an expertly crafted observation about the mental capacity of Barack Obama. This man is dangerous, and his objectives are very clear. The problem is with his capacity to think rationally. -JRoycroft
We Have A Problem — A Real Problem
By Neal Boortz
No .. I’m not talking about the fiscal cliff, nor am I talking about the almost $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities we face as a nation. Iran and a nuke? Yeah .. that’s serious all right, but I’m told that we are messin’ with Iran right now in ways that you couldn’t even imagine – ways that could derail their nuclear plans for some time to come. Is the real problem our sagging economy? An oncoming second recession? The growth of government dependency? Sure … all of those are problems and all are difficult to deal with … but they pale to insignificance to the problem I’m bringing up here.
I think that it is truly time for us – those of us capable of thinking clearly and, perhaps, just a bit outside the box – to consider the possibility that somehow we have found ourselves with a president who is not all there. Yes. I mean that. This president was never vetted by the media; that would have been racist. He is a man with an admitted history of drug use. Those portions of his past that he has not chosen to write about are shrouded in dark mystery. And — now think about this — for perhaps the first time since they started issuing security clearances, we have a president who simply could not qualify for one. If Obama were being hired to work in the White House, instead of occupying it, the FBI would simply recommend against a security clearance and the job would go away. Isn’t it funny how a history with drug abuse and associations with known and convicted domestic terrorists and crime figures can screw up a good day?
The work, I think, that I’m looking for here is “psychosis.” In this case I believe we have a man – a president – with an obsession bordering on psychosis for punishing wealthy people for what he sees as the crime of becoming wealthy.
I could go into detail here on the influences Obama’s father, his mother, and his communist mentor Frank Marshall Davis had on Obama during his formative years. I could then follow up with the influences of Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, and those Marxist professors and student groups he says he liked to hand around in college. What we should concern ourselves with, however, is where these influences led Obama, and the answer is clear. Obama has a deep, ingrained and very powerful hatred of the rich. He believes that people with wealth acquired their riches by exploiting and oppressing others. He makes exceptions, of course, for the fabulously rich athletes and entertainers, who surround him, fawn over him, worship him, and defend him. Bread and circuses have always been a part of the leftist methodology. The left will excuse any accumulation of wealth if it serves the end of distracting the public from matters that really might have an affect on their lives.
Back, though, to Obama’s obsession with punishing the wealth; and that’s his primary goal – punishment. Raising revenues is only secondary in his mind.
I’ve gone through this before, but just start collecting some rhetorical gems from Dear Ruler over the years. It bears repeating …
- Obama’s statement to Joe the Plumber that we need to spread the wealth around. He did not say we needed to raise taxes to fund government. The purpose was to take from those who had earned the excess wealth and then give it to those who had not.
- Obama’s statement to Charlie Gibson that even though increasing capital gains taxes would not lead to more revenue, it needed to be done “out of fairness.” Again — increased revenue to fund government or pay down the debt was not the issue.
- Obama’s admonition to high-achievers that at some point they needed to admit that they’ve made enough money. Again – no drive for increased government revenues here.
Do you get the picture here? This is an obsession for punishing the rich, not an attempt to develop sound economic policy. To really track the path of Obama’s obsession with punishing just take a look at the changes in rhetoric as the arguments mounted against his beloved tax increase on the wealthy.
In the beginning Obama tells the people that the rich “need to pay their fair share.” The “fair share” line comes right out of Democrat focus groups. We’re taught from infancy that fairness is good … everyone and everything should be fair … and that includes what we pay in taxes. And if Obama is saying that the rich “need to” pay their fair share, well then that must mean that they’re not paying their fair share now and something should be done about it.
Then Obama and the Democrats gradually change the rhetoric. It goes from the rich “need” or “should” pay their fair share to the rich “aren’t” paying their fair share and their taxes must be increased.
The Republicans respond with an offer to revise the tax code by eliminating some deductions. Now even though we have a spending problem, not a tax revenue problem, this offer made much better sense than just raising the tax rates. Why? Because Obama’s tax increase would hit small businesses. Now Obama was right when he said that over 95% of small businesses would not be hit with the tax increase. What he didn’t say is that the three percent or so of the businesses that WOULD be nailed are the businesses that employ 70% of all Americans and are right now are providing over 50% of all new private sector jobs. The changes in tax deductions the Republicans were proposing would not affect these businesses and their tax burdens would not increase.
Obama knew that if the people actually started paying attention they would realize that the GOP proposal to modify tax deductions would produce the revenue increases Dear Ruler says he wants while protecting small businesses. This meant he had to change his rhetoric again. So now we have Obama largely abandoning his “raise taxes on the rich” rhetoric to “raise tax RATES on the rich.” Referencing tax RATES suppresses GOP arguments for other ways to raise revenues.
All of this shows that Obama’s concern is not so much with increasing tax revenues as it is with punishing high-achievers whom Obama feels obtained their wealth through dishonesty, exploitation and oppression. If you follow the news as closely as I do you will see that many low-information Americans out there will echo this sentiment. Obama is probably aware that increases in tax rates seldom result in the revenues wished for. He cares not. It’s about retribution and punishment, not dealing with our deficit and spending problem.
November 23, 2012 – I think it gets worse every year. We should have arena seating inside these stores and sell tickets. Best show in town for watching just how pathetic some of these insane shoppers are. It’s like Jerry Springer, only this crap is for real and not staged. Humans turning into ruthless animals to save a few bucks. Absolutely amazing how fast these people turn on each other. This is an example, on a smaller scale, of how life will be when the moochers lose their access to our money. Humans can be pretty damn scary when their selfish switch turns on. -JRoycroft
‘Gang fight’ at Black Friday sale…
Man Punched in Face Pulls Gun On Line-Cutting Shopper…
Shots fired outside WALMART…
Shoppers smash through door at URBAN OUTFITTERS…
Customers run over in parking lot…
Woman busted after throwing merchandise…
Thousands storm VICTORIA’S SECRET…
VIDEO: Insane battle over phones…
Mayhem at Nebraska mall where 9 murdered in 2007…
Shoplifter tries to mace security guards…
Men Steal Boy’s Shopping Bag Outside BED, BATH & BEYOND…
Heckler calls them zombies…
November 1, 2012 – One of two people will be elected President of the United States of America. Mitt Romney or Barack Obama. This is a fact. No matter who else is on the ballot, it will only be one of those two people. They are your only possible winners in this campaign.
Here are the reasons why Barack Obama might be re-elected:
- 49.1% of American households have at least one member who receives a government welfare check of some kind. That person will vote for the person who will most likely continue sending that check, and will try to encourage another member of that household to get their “fair share.”
- 40.7% of new births are to un-married single women. That’s about 41 out of every 100 babies born to an un-married single female. Those single mothers are receiving W.I.C vouchers, welfare checks, E.B.T. cards, Section 8 housing and a host of other freebees from our government. They, too, will vote for the person who will most likely continue sending those checks because they need a sugar daddy.
- And the third reason why I believe Barack Obama might win, is because there are people who are determined to vote for a third party candidate or not vote at all, and we all know what that means. It means they are throwing there vote away and don’t give a damn about the direction our country is headed.
Some of you need to come to the realization that neither Gary Johnson or Ron Paul have a chance in hell of winning this election, so why are you voting for them? When you wake up Wednesday morning it’s going to be either Obama or Romney as your President. That is a fact you cannot deny. The question is, will you wake up Wednesday morning with a clear conscience knowing you voted for the person who has the best plan to save our Republic, or did you vote for someone who you knew had absolutely no chance in hell of winning which directly resulted in who our President would be. Think about your children and your grand children. We are 0ver $16 TRILLION in debt. You can’t even count that damn high in your lifetime.
If Mitt Romney wins our Republic might have a chance, and that’s a really big might. If on the other hand Barack Obama wins, well, based on his last four years, I give our Republic a big kiss good bye. The United States of America will never be saved. I truly believe this. It will be the end of the single greatest experiment in freedom, liberty and independence any country has ever known. The last slice of American pie will have been re-distributed, all for the selfish idea of wealth envy. Atlas will have shrugged. -JRoycroft
October 30, 2012 – Today was one of those days when I decided to leave a random comment on another blog just to get a reaction from their readers. It’s something I do from time to time just to stir things up a bit. It actually works quite well, especially when I make an insensitive and politically incorrect comment. It’s so much fun to get the progs rattled.
The blog post I visited today is titled, “Any given storm,” and it has received the honor of being, “Freshly Pressed,” by the WordPress team. It’s a very well written blog, and I would highly recommend you visit.
Apparently a member of the WordPress team, “timethief,”took offense to my comment today, and had a rather snotty comment of her own to make in reaction. That’s all fine and well, except that this little insensitive Obama follower did it in a manner that no one but I could see the comment. I suppose working for WordPress has it’s quirks, like having the ability to hide like a little coward rather than making your statement in public.
My comment that got the little snot upset:
J Roycroft says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
The damage that hurricane Sandy will cause will be repaired in a year. No hurricane on record has caused as much financial loss or damage as hurricane Obama. That financial loss may never be repaired.
My comment had nothing what so ever to do with the article as it was written, but it did offer up the opportunity for me to toss in bone. And bite she did. This Canadian proggy bit the whole damn thing and left this snotty little response, which as I stated earlier, can only be seen by me because it was left “Pending”, which by the way, doesn’t offer me the ability to remark back to her. Funny how it’s been removed yet it still remains in my notifications bar as “Pending.” Very strange.
Her response to me:
In reply to your commentThe damage that hurricane Sandy will cause will be repaired in a year. No hurricane on record …
Oh really? Here you are taking the typical cheap shot that exemplifies those who are memory challenged primitive thinkers grinding political axes. Obama inherited a economic disaster but some can’t seem to recall the nine years of economic destruction wrought by the Bush administrations. I’m a Canadian by choice (dual) and I sincerely hope that forgetful south of the border won’t be able to find their way to polling booths.
My, my, what a sensitive bitchy little Canadian she is.
First of all, it isn’t even the comment or fact that she responded. It’s exactly what I was expecting, but not from a member of the WordPress team. I also left her a comment challenging her to visit my blog and go public with her snottiness, but oh hell no. She has yet to publish my comment. Coward!
My response back to her, on her blog:
J Roycroft says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Why don’t you visit my blog and leave one of your snotty little political comments there so we can determine how you really feel about your support of Obama instead of hiding behind your mask and leaving comments that no one else can see?
So with all that being said, this cowardly little proggy did what progs do best…they run their whiny mouths, stomp and cry with their poor little hurt feelings, and then hide to prevent debate. She knows that her comment cannot be defended because it is based on emotion, not fact.
Shame on her for doing the nasty as a representative of WordPress. Very unprofessional and inappropriate.
So dear readers and subscribers to The Roycroft Report, should my blog disappear over night, or the coming days, we can all assume that the powers to be have no sense of humor and are themselves members of the insensitive and politically correct crowd of progs.
Please pray for me. -JRoycroft
October 23, 2012 – As reported last week in INFO WARS and THE ROYCROFT REPORT, some Obama supporters are Tweeting threats of murder, violence and riots if Obama loses the election. After last nights debate, the threats have increased. The culture of black violence in America may rear it’s ugly head even if Obama wins. They are unpredictable and are looking for a reason to steal, burn, assault and murder the innocent. -JRoycroft
- Threats to Assassinate Romney Explode After Debate
- Establishment Plays Race Card to Bury Violent Threats by Obama Supporters
- Obama Supporters Continue to Threaten Riots If Romney Wins
- Obama Supporters Threaten To Kill Romney If He Wins Election
- Secret Service ‘Aware’ of Threats Against Romney
- New Threats to Riot if Obama Loses Election
- Tweets Reveal Obama Supporters Fueled by ‘Racial Hatred’